Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
34th Street Magazine - Return Home

Film & TV

Tongue in cheek

Shall We Dance Starring: Richard Gere, Jennifer Lopez Director: Peter Chelsom Rated: PG-13

After 19 years of marriage, John Clark (Richard Gere), an outwardly content accountant, decides he is missing something in his life. While traveling home one day, he spots the beautifully exotic but distressed Paulina (Jennifer Lopez) in a ballroom dance studio window and decides, on a whim, to sign up for lessons. He begins class that day alongside Chic (Bobby Canavale) and Vern (Omar Miller). In due course, John's attraction to Paulina diminishes, but his uncanny love of dance intensifies. Still, John's wife, Beverly (Susan Sarandon), suspects he is having an affair because of his unusual hours, and hires a detective.

In this tongue-in-cheek film, the supporting cast comes close to stealing the spotlight from the leads. Each character, animated and amusing, brings comedy to the movie. From the homosexual pretending to learn to dance in order to impress women to the obese man practicing for his wedding, the laughter never ceases. Shall We Dance is a sweet romantic story, perfect for a date, maybe even for a tear or two. Still, it is nothing more than an hour and a half of enjoyable, lighthearted entertainment.


More like this
ironlungdom.png
Review

‘Iron Lung’ and the Rise of the YouTuber Film

Iron Lung shows how a creator with a large online audience turned a low budget game adaptation into strong box office revenue through fan driven promotion and social reach. YouTube creators build direct audience ties, run production pipelines, and mobilize viewers to support projects across media platforms. The film’s performance signals a shift where online personalities compete with studio backed releases through community scale and digital marketing power.

Wicked Duology
Film & TV

‘Wicked: For Good’ is for the Theatre Kids

Wicked: For Good closes its story without awards recognition but with clear creative conviction. The film’s reception reflects a mismatch between its intentions and critical expectations. Designed as the second half of a continuous narrative, it prioritizes character depth and long-term emotional payoff over accessibility. In doing so, For Good succeeds less as a crowd-pleaser and more as a film made for those already invested in the world of Wicked.