Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
34th Street Magazine - Return Home

Review

Review: "Runner Runner"

Runner Runner

Penn students may not be able to enjoy “Runner Runner” for one reason:  Richie Furst (Justin Timberlake), the protagonist, goes to Princeton.

Despite this particular unsavory detail, the movie proved to be a pleasant surprise. Let me quantify: “Runner Runner” will not be hailed as a classic anytime soon. Its lead is weak, and clichés riddle the script. However, for every bad thing in the movie, some good balances it out. That cliché-ridden script runs wild with great one-liners and trots along at a brisk pace, never getting bogged down in too much drama. It focuses on the plot and refuses to let Timberlake try to act too much. Truthfully, the only real word to describe JT in the film is “meh,” but Ben Affleck more than makes up for it as the villain, Ivan Block. His menacing presence throughout the movie is not lost on the audience, who tenses up whenever he appears on screen, not sure what he’ll do next.

Although much of the third act turns out to be very, very predictable, the end still proves to be a satisfying finale. The film is short, sweet and to the point, not dragging its conclusion out any farther than it needs to. For its hour and a half run time, it’s well worth the price of admission.

Grade: B

Rating & Runtime: R, 91 minutes

See if you Liked: “Ocean’s Eleven”

More like this
ironlungdom.png
Review

‘Iron Lung’ and the Rise of the YouTuber Film

Iron Lung shows how a creator with a large online audience turned a low budget game adaptation into strong box office revenue through fan driven promotion and social reach. YouTube creators build direct audience ties, run production pipelines, and mobilize viewers to support projects across media platforms. The film’s performance signals a shift where online personalities compete with studio backed releases through community scale and digital marketing power.

Wicked Duology
Film & TV

‘Wicked: For Good’ is for the Theatre Kids

Wicked: For Good closes its story without awards recognition but with clear creative conviction. The film’s reception reflects a mismatch between its intentions and critical expectations. Designed as the second half of a continuous narrative, it prioritizes character depth and long-term emotional payoff over accessibility. In doing so, For Good succeeds less as a crowd-pleaser and more as a film made for those already invested in the world of Wicked.